• AS_UCSB twitter avatar
    RT @asprogramboard: Thanksgiving is right around the corner and we wanted to share with you some of the songs we were most thankful for!Fol…
    5 hours 22 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Gauchos Continue Busy November at Pepperdine Monday https://t.co/pHfynK7NgJ
    8 hours 17 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    UCSB Swim Victorious at UNLV Invitational https://t.co/qWTOCI2gKt
    9 hours 56 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    How does water get to our faucets? Here's a breakdown of #water sourceing in #California: https://t.co/mYi1EHLZdf… https://t.co/8sCKzkuxso
    12 hours 23 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    From the 1800s to 1940s, tourism was essential to establishing and maintaining the Japanese empire, according to… https://t.co/nAwGVMg4zt
    14 hours 52 min ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    #UCSB Black Studies Librarian Kynita Stringer-Stanback with Angela Davis and Gloria Steinem at #NWSA2017 https://t.co/1WKrCf2uPG
    15 hours 2 min ago

A Steady Pulse

Ocean vital signs are stable, but bill of health isn’t clean, concludes a multiyear global assessment by researchers from NCEAS
Wednesday, July 5, 2017 - 13:45
Santa Barbara, CA

Fish Costa Rica.jpg

Isla de Coco, Costa Rica

Fish swiming in an eastern tropical seascape off Cocos Island, Costa Rica.

Photo Credit: 

Conservation International/photo by Sterling Zumbrunn

Halpern-UCSB_UCOP-30.jpg

Ben Halpern

Ben Halpern

Photo Credit: 

Elena Zhukova for UCOP

For perhaps the first time ever, the world’s oceans have a health record — and it’s revealing clues about what might be behind symptoms of ocean improvements or declines alike.

A study by a team of researchers from the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) at UC Santa Barbara and Conservation International synthesized five years’ worth of vital signs on a host of indicators — ranging from water quality to food provision to tourism potential — and found that while overall ocean health appears to be stable, the oceans around many of the 220 countries analyzed are changing, and in many cases not for the better. Their results are published in the journal PLOS ONE.

“With five years of assessments about where oceans are healthy and not as healthy, we finally have enough information to get a clear signal of what might be causing changes,” said lead author Ben Halpern, executive director of NCEAS, referring to the Ocean Health Index, the innovative tool his team used to make the assessments.

According to Halpern, countries that are seeing notable improvement in their oceans are taking concrete actions to make things better, like creating marine protected areas and improving their management of wild-caught fisheries. Indonesia, Mexico and Samoa are examples of such countries.

Among the countries that saw a decline in ocean health were those with consistent political instability, as well many Arctic and sub-Arctic countries, where coastlines are losing natural protection from storm damage and erosion — sea ice — which is rapidly melting.

“The Ocean Health Index created the first opportunity any of us has had to measure the health of our oceans in a comprehensive way and track changes with a single measure,” Halpern said.

A collaborative effort between Conservation International and NCEAS, the Ocean Health Index is like the Fitbit for oceans. It allows scientists to assess ocean health by measuring environmental, economic and social factors that reflect how people benefit from and affect oceans, and is designed to guide ocean policy and management.

“Imagine going to your doctor, and she tells you your resting pulse is 75 and your temperature is 99.1. Those single data points are barely useful,” explained Halpern. “But now imagine you’ve done regular annual exams, and you’ve been keeping track of your diet and exercise regime. Your doctor shows you most of your stats are stable and last year, when you were exercising regularly and eating healthy, your blood pressure and cholesterol went down. That’s profoundly more insightful information.”

A regular, comprehensive diagnostic exam for the world’s oceans provides decision makers with information and knowledge they can use to implement effective actions for improved sustainable ocean management, he added.

In terms of how well oceans globally have been doing over time, the index has scored their overall health at a steady 71 out of 100 since 2013, indicating that oceans aren’t dying but neither are they thriving. The researchers will continue to monitor ocean health on an annual basis.

“We believe the Ocean Health Index gives reason for hope by providing a detailed diagnosis of the state of ocean health and a framework that allows countries to identify and prioritize the most necessary resilience actions to improve ocean health,” said co-author Johanna Polsenberg, senior director of governance and policy for Conservation International’s Center for Oceans. “This is where our work is most valuable. It helps identify and highlight the necessary steps to ensure a healthy ocean into the future.”

The data from this study can be explored via an interactive website found here.

Contact Info: 

Jenny Seifert
(608) 512-6259
seifert@nceas.ucsb.edu

Topics: