• AS_UCSB twitter avatar
    RT @UCSBCAB: follow our adventures on snapchat! @ ucsbcab
    1 hour 12 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    #BrenUCSB environmental law professor Jim Salzman & others join the @EDC_Action board of directors https://t.co/YyomJ46e1P
    1 hour 30 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    #UCSB physicist Joseph Polchinski has won the prestigious 2017 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics! https://t.co/bzrUrKrKE7
    2 hours 53 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Congrats to #UCSB's Glenn Fredrickson for receiving recognition from the American Institute of Chemical Engineers! https://t.co/R2inUBApih
    15 hours 53 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    #BrenUCSB Group Project investigates effects of Mexico's "no-take zones" on food security & ocean health https://t.co/VS2q8eHLGY
    19 hours 22 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    AVCA Names Ruddins All-Pacific South Region Honorable Mention https://t.co/LBJOFIyPkm
    21 hours 13 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    How could changes in #Arctic resource-sharing behaviors affect #indigenous communities? https://t.co/cEXc8A9nPN via @ScienceDaily
    22 hours 22 min ago
  • UCSBengineering twitter avatar
    UCSB Engineers, we're doing #CoffeeMeCOE tomorrow from 11AM-2PM. Tweet us your study photos using our hashtag and w… https://t.co/Q4HRiuB4mU
    1 day 25 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    New management strategies are needed to build #sustainable tuna #fisheries: https://t.co/0aRzp93zNp via @EnvDefenseFund
    1 day 48 min ago
  • AS_UCSB twitter avatar
    AS Study Jam at the Community Resource Building. 970 Embarcadero del Mar - behind Nan Stop. Open 24 hours through finals week! snacks, wifi.
    1 day 50 min ago

Nature Versus Nurture

A psychologist shows that while environmental intervention can raise general intelligence, the effects aren’t permanent
Monday, March 14, 2016 - 10:15
Santa Barbara, CA

Scientists have long agreed that we humans are a complex combination of our inherited traits and the environments in which we are raised. How the scales tip in one direction or the other, however, is still the subject of much debate.

To better understand the nature versus nurture question, UC Santa Barbara psychologist John Protzko analyzed an existing study to determine whether and how environmental interventions impacted the intelligence levels of low birth weight children.

The key finding: Interventions did raise intelligence levels, but not permanently. When the interventions ended, their effects diminished over time in what psychologists describe as “the fadeout effect.” The research is highlighted in the journal Intelligence.

“Certain environmental interventions can raise general intelligence,” said Protzko, a postdoctoral scholar in the META (Memory, Emotion, Thought, Awareness) Lab in UCSB’s Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences. “It’s not just pushing scores around on a test; it’s deep changes to underlying general intelligence. The fadeout effect, however, applies the same way.” Scientists make a distinction between IQ scores, a quantitative measure of intelligence, and general intelligence, which reflects underlying cognitive abilities.

Protzko reviewed the results of the Infant Health and Development Program involving 985 children, all of whom experienced an intense and cognitively demanding environment during the first three years of their lives. Three main interventions had been employed to ameliorate the negative effects of being born at low birth weight.

At age 3, the children were given the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales as a baseline measure of their intelligence. At ages 5 and 8 — at least two years after the interventions had ended — they were again given intelligence tests.

The results showed that the interventions had raised the children’s general intelligence at age 3. However, by age 5 the increases were no longer evident. According to Protzko, this demonstrates that the fadeout effect applies to general intelligence.

He also noted that this difference in intelligence at ages 3 and 5 underscored another issue: causality. One theory regarding the development of intelligence suggests that the trait can be correlated between two ages because there is a causal connection: Intelligence at one age causes intelligence at another age.

“However, my analysis starts to bring evidence to the idea that intelligence may not be the causal factor we suppose it to be from the correlation work — at least not in children,” Protzko explained. “It’s unlikely that given an increase in intelligence, I would live my life any differently than I do right now. This work will have to be done in adults to really pull that apart, but I think that this analysis starts to bring evidence against that idea of causality.”

This is the second of two papers Protzko has published on the fadeout effect. Both highlight the unidirectional reaction model, which suggests that intelligence can adapt to meet increased environmental demands but when those demands are no longer present, it returns to its previous level.

“Raising IQ is not an instance of raising test scores with no concomitant effects on the latent underlying intelligence,” Protzko said. “While both IQ scores and general intelligence can be raised through targeted environmental interventions, any gains are not permanent and fade over time.

Nonetheless, he noted, his analysis doesn’t indicate that interventions aimed at enhancing intellectual development are useless or doomed to fail. “I believe it is still a good thing to intervene and try to change the trajectory for these children,” he said.

Contact Info: 

Julie Cohen
(805) 893-7220
julie.cohen@ucsb.edu

Topics: