• UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Moreno de Alboran Advances to First ITA Southwest Regionals Singles Championship in Program History https://t.co/gFomRfFLBB
    5 hours 6 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Gauchos Fall 1-0 at Cal State Fullerton https://t.co/PGG96WtNIF
    7 hours 42 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    A UCSB biologist examines the benefits & drawbacks of virtual & augmented reality in teaching environmental science. https://t.co/uB40WL1q0O
    8 hours 21 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    .@UCSB_Volleyball makes it three wins for the week after sweeping CSUN Saturday night! RECAP >>>… https://t.co/Y0rCoOnBi6
    1 day 5 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    .@UCSBMensSoccer takes on UC Davis in a battle for first tonight at Harder Stadium! Tune in here:… https://t.co/Zn3WPNjEok
    1 day 8 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    UCSB Beats PAC-12's UCLA By 14 Points https://t.co/HGdLRkF1op
    1 day 11 hours ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    RT @Marikhasmanyan: Reppin @UCSBLibrary with @ForestSways and @Stahlmatt at #ArchivesBazaar if you're in the area stop by for a chat and gr…
    1 day 15 hours ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    RT @ForestSways: Come visit @UCSBLibrary archives table at #ArchivesBazaar https://t.co/tYLQmkTjDh
    1 day 16 hours ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    CA Assemblymember visited #UCSB’s food pantry after adopting a $7.5 million budget to combat food insecurity. https://t.co/tlWK9TZVIL
    1 day 17 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    No. 10 UCSB Drops Road Match to No. 8 Long Beach State, 10-6 https://t.co/vGlvB1TN23
    2 days 2 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Da Silveira and Dubavets Stay Afloat and Advance to Round of 16 https://t.co/ZSxtqldlOq
    2 days 3 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    .@UCSB_Volleyball gets revenge, knocks off LBSU in four behind 26K-17D double-double from Lindsey Ruddins. RECAP >>… https://t.co/MVhhyi4I4J
    2 days 5 hours ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Moreno de Alboran Shines in Day Two of ITA Southwest Regionals https://t.co/R1amVJQr0B
    2 days 5 hours ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    RT @sbseasons: Rhiannon Giddens Comes to Campbell Hall! 10/26 https://t.co/FyWnr2pSH7 @Sbseasons #seasonsmagazine #sb @artsandlectures @Rh
    2 days 11 hours ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    #GauchoAlum Navjot Brar ’16 is a founder of UCSB Startup Weekends and business analyst at Carpe Data.… https://t.co/TZeKVCz0P3
    2 days 17 hours ago

A Flawed Measure

BMI is not an accurate measure of health, according to research by UCSB psychologist Jeffrey Hunger and colleagues
Thursday, February 4, 2016 - 00:30
Santa Barbara, CA

Hunger.jpg

BMI is not an accurate measure of health

Jeffrey Hunger

Photo Credit: 

Sonia Fernandez

Fit or fat? How about both?

In what could be the death knell for that once-vaunted measure of health known as BMI (body mass index), new research out of UC Santa Barbara and UCLA reveals that millions of Americans labeled overweight or obese based on their BMI are, in fact, “perfectly healthy.”

Their findings, which appear in the International Journal of Obesity, suggest that 34.4 million Americans considered overweight by virtue of BMI are actually healthy, as are 19.8 million who are considered obese.

According to Jeffrey Hunger, a doctoral student in UCSB’s Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, and a co-author of the paper, BMI is a deeply flawed measure of health. “In the overweight BMI category, 47 percent are perfectly healthy,” he said. “So to be using BMI as a health proxy — particularly for everyone within that category — is simply incorrect. Our study should be the final nail in the coffin for BMI.”

Using data from the most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the scientists analyzed the link between BMI — calculated by dividing a person’s weight in kilograms by the square of the person’s height in meters — and several health markers, including blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol. The results showed that more than 2 million people identified as “very obese” by virtue of having a BMI of 35 or higher are, in reality, healthy; that's about 15 percent of Americans so classified. The research also revealed that more than 30 percent of those with BMIs in the “normal” range — about 20.7 million people — are actually unhealthy based on their other markers.

“Not only does BMI mislabel 54 million heavier individuals as unhealthy, it actually overlooks a large group of individuals considered to have a ‘healthy’ BMI who are actually unhealthy when you look at underlying clinical indicators,” said Hunger. “We used a fairly strict definition of health. You had to be at clinically healthy levels on four out of the five health indicators assessed.”

Many U.S. companies use employees’ BMI as a factor in determining their health insurance costs. And if a rule proposed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is adopted, people with a BMI higher than 25 (the “healthy” range is 18.5 to 24.99) could find themselves paying higher health insurance premiums.

“We need to move away from trying to find a single metric on which to penalize or incentivize people and instead focus on finding effective ways to improve behaviors known to have positive outcomes over time,” Hunger argued.

Lead author Janet Tomiyama, an assistant professor of psychology at UCLA, noted that healthy people with BMIs above 24.99 would be no more likely to incur higher medical expenses than those with lower BMIs, so requiring those individuals to pay out more in health insurance premiums would not be justified.

Previous research by Tomiyama’s Dieting, Stress and Health (DiSH) laboratory at UCLA found no clear connection between weight loss and health improvements related to hypertension, cholesterol and diabetes and blood glucose levels. The new study recommends that people focus on a healthy diet and regular exercise, rather than placing emphasis on their weight.

Others contributing to the research include Jolene Nguyen-Cuu and Christine Wells of UCLA. The research was funded by the Hellman Fellows Fund.

Contact Info: 

Julie Cohen
(805) 893-7220
julie.cohen@ucsb.edu

Topics: