• UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WWP: Gauchos End The Day With A Dominate Win And A Close Loss https://t.co/U0mHxrjEPb
    3 hours 15 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Gauchos Share The Cape In All-Around 74-62 Win Over Hawai'i On Super Hero Night https://t.co/7JozUy4Wi1
    4 hours 36 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Vincent Hits 1,000 Point Mark But UCSB Loses at UC Riverside, 65-55 https://t.co/rvtR2CFZwU
    5 hours 28 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    Tune in to @prairie_home to hear @odonovanaoife & pals performing songs from #lalaland! Now on KCLU
    6 hours 12 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: FINAL UCSB 74 - Hawaii 62 Gauchos rack up season-best 4th straight win, improve to 9-9 (4-1). Edelman 19pts 6reb, Toler 17pts off bench
    6 hours 34 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: We're inside the last minute of regulation, Toler with 10 points in the final quarter. 71-60 UCSB 46.1 remaining.
    6 hours 40 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Gauchos roar off the first 8pts and Hawaii needs to talk about it! 58-45 UCSB 7:54 remaining in the fourth quarter.
    6 hours 56 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: End of Third Quarter UCSB 50 - Hawaii 45 Hernandez goes for 8pts in 3Q. Gaucho pep band is ready for the fourt… https://t.co/VDP5Er1MZ1
    7 hours 3 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Gauchos respond to a mini Hawaii run with a Durr and-one, and back-to-back 3's from Hernandez. 45-37 UCSB 4:56 left in 3Q.
    7 hours 12 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Halftime UCSB 31 - Hawaii 26 Edelman with team highs 10pts and 3rebs. Gauchos a 14-8 pts in paint advantage, 11-2 off turnovers.
    7 hours 35 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Toler with an emphatic chase down block from behind! She has first 2 buckets for UCSB in 2Q. 27-19 Gauchos, 4:21 before halftime.
    7 hours 46 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: End of First Quarter UCSB 23 - Hawaii 15. Porter leads all scorers with 9pts, 3/4 from downtown. Gauchos 11pts from 5 Hawaii turnovers.
    7 hours 57 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WBB: Gauchos sink their first 4 from the field, 3/3 from downtown and lead 18-9 at 1Q media break. Porter 2/2 for trey, Edelman doing work.
    8 hours 2 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    Growing an interest in nature: #UCSB students & Edible Campus Project plant seeds of sustainability in preschoolers https://t.co/dyoiFtroWo
    13 hours 46 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Gauchos Travel to No. 7 UCLA https://t.co/JPxd6rq7Qt
    1 day 4 hours ago

The Fadeout Effect

A meta-analysis shows that the beneficial effects of interventions to raise intelligence in young children fade over time
Thursday, December 3, 2015 - 11:30
Santa Barbara, CA

iStock_000018160408_Large.jpg

A new study illustrates the role of the environment in the development of intelligence.

Photo Credit: 

Susan Chiang, iStock

The winner of a decades-old debate about what scientists call the fadeout effect — one of the most persistent research mysteries in intelligence and psychological development — may finally have been decided.

Following a meta-analysis of experimental methods to determine whether or not the benefits of early interactions designed to raise intelligence remain over time, UC Santa Barbara postdoctoral researcher John Protzko found that the positive effects on intelligence actually diminish after a particular intervention ends. Protzko’s study marks the first quantitative analysis of the fadeout effect across nearly every known intervention that has attempted to improve early intelligence.

The findings, which appear in the journal Intelligence, have important implications for the long-term benefits of programs such as Head Start, a federal initiative that promotes school readiness of children under 5 from low-income families through education, health, social and other services.

“Many theories of cognitive development and the relationship between the environment and intelligence are not able to account for the fadeout effect,” said Protzko, who is a member of the META (Memory, Emotion, Thought, Awareness) Lab in the Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences at UCSB. “Reciprocal interaction models, for example, put forward that no such fading would occur. It turns out that when you raise children’s intelligence, they may not go out and select into new, more cognitively demanding environments. Other traits may be driving what environments children select into.”

The 44 randomized controlled trials that Protzko analyzed for the study included a total of 7,584 young children. He found that those in the experimental groups lost their IQ gains, rather than the control group catching up. According to Protzko, this provides a clear demonstration that intelligence fades over time.

“That actually tells us a lot about the role of the environment in the development of intelligence,” Protzko said. “It shows that intelligence is reactionary. While providing interventions will raise intelligence, once they’re over, intelligence reacts by adapting to the new, lesser demands.         

“If you take kids and put them in a Head Start program, for example, then they’ll be smarter and their academic achievement will be better,” Protzko added. “But when you take that away and put them back in with everybody else, they’re going to adapt to that new system. It doesn’t work in any permanent sort of way.”

Protzko is careful to reiterate that his work in no way posits that early interventions are doomed to fail or that they are of no value. “This paper doesn’t argue that intelligence cannot be raised,” he said. “Instead, it urges that a critical assumption long held — that increases to intelligence are permanent — be questioned and rejected. I believe it is still a good thing to intervene and try to change the trajectory for these children.”

All of the studies included in the analysis were done on young children, Protzko noted. “To know if the fadeout effect is applicable to other demographics like adolescents, young adults or the elderly, there would need to be a push toward long-term follow-up — two, three, four, five years, maybe even longer — for these groups as well,” he concluded.

Contact Info: 

Julie Cohen
(805) 893-7220
julie.cohen@ucsb.edu

Topics: