• ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Reminder: updates about the impacts of the #ThomasFire on campus operations are posted on The #UCSB Current: https://t.co/Hmm6PkVoi3
    8 hours 57 min ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    #UCSB Library will be closing tonight at midnight. We will reopen tomorrow at 8AM. Recess hours will be in effect M… https://t.co/fom6hAvC09
    13 hours 14 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    ICYMI: #UCSB fall quarter final exams have been rescheduled for the week of January 8th. For answers to FAQs relate… https://t.co/v0dklvXDS0
    13 hours 49 min ago
  • UCSB_GradPost twitter avatar
    Resources and updates for Thomas Fire https://t.co/YDATGJf7rb #UCSB #ucsbgradpost
    15 hours 21 min ago
  • UCSBengineering twitter avatar
    RT @ucsantabarbara: Final exams scheduled for the coming week will be rescheduled for the week of January 8. #UCSB students who wish to lea…
    15 hours 37 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Updates from Chancellor Yang's latest memo (4 of 4). The campus will remain open. Student housing, including reside… https://t.co/IkKUjg1Png
    16 hours 35 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Updates from Chancellor Yang's latest memo (3 of 4). The revised final exam schedule will be posted on the Office o… https://t.co/K1gbw5KUXZ
    16 hours 36 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Updates from Chancellor Yang's latest memo (2 of 4). Fall quarter has been extended. Winter quarter will now begin… https://t.co/88DzDNIcBv
    16 hours 38 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Updates from Chancellor Yang's latest memo (1 of 4). Final exams scheduled for the coming week will be rescheduled… https://t.co/Yh3W3Jcmjo
    16 hours 39 min ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    The Library remains open for students that need a place to gather and/or begin making alternative plans for the now… https://t.co/S0TalpXviJ
    16 hours 57 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    Final exams scheduled for the coming week will be rescheduled for the week of January 8. #UCSB students who wish to… https://t.co/goWRKavefr
    17 hours 47 sec ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    RT @UCSBHousing: Message from #UCSB Chancellor Yang re: #ThomasFire https://t.co/cffzAyhOaV
    17 hours 7 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    Cape Code fishermen bring sustainably harvested, 'under-loved' #fish to New England Diners https://t.co/ZcHLoUKMHP https://t.co/vqGUmOqu7X
    18 hours 18 min ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    RT @UCSBETS: All #UCSB campus networking has been working properly for at least 30 minutes, and the vast majority has been working for an h…
    20 hours 7 min ago
  • UCSBLibrary twitter avatar
    The #UCSB Library remains open. With ongoing power outages all elevators, with the exception of the elevator near t… https://t.co/JKKgCPw4BY
    20 hours 13 min ago

Ecosystem Services: Looking Forward to Mid-Century

Research by Bren professor projects land-use changes up to 2051 and examines options for auctions that provide incentives for landowners
Thursday, May 29, 2014 - 13:00
Santa Barbara, CA

Plantinga_ecosystem_services.jpg

ag land

Policies need to balance various land uses to preserve valuable ecosystem services.

As population grows, society needs more — more energy, more food, more paper, more housing, more of nearly everything. Meeting those needs can lead to changes in how land is used.

Native grasslands, forests and wetlands may be converted into croplands, tree plantations, residential areas and commercial developments. Those conversions can, in turn, diminish the health of natural ecosystems and their ability to provide an array of valuable services, such as clean air and water, wildlife and opportunities for recreation, to name a few.

In two papers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, UC Santa Barbara’s Andrew Plantinga addresses how to strike a balance between providing for humanity’s growing needs and preserving the natural systems that make it possible to meet those needs. In one paper, Plantinga, a professor at the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, and colleagues model the future of land-use change in the United States under various scenarios and possible effects on the provision of some important ecosystem services. In a related publication, the researchers develop incentive structures to best encourage landowners to provide ecosystem services.

The work of the first paper explains a new land-use model for the contiguous U.S., which forecasts trends from 2001-2051 using two baseline scenarios and three policy alternatives designed to encourage forest cover and the preservation of natural landscapes as well as the reduction of urban expansion.

“The 1990s Trend” baseline scenario assumes land-use trends will continue as they did during the 1990s, resulting in less cropland, pasture and rangeland and more forests and urbanization. The “High Crop Demand” model accounts for significant growth in the demand for agricultural commodities as well as related pressures to expand agricultural lands. The researchers used these scenarios as alternative baselines against which they analyzed the effects of the three alternative land-use policies: forest incentives, natural habitats and urban containment.

The first policy provides incentives for reduced deforestation and for afforestation — moving land into forest, whether by converting cropland to natural forest or by establishing commercial timber operations. The second provides incentives for conserving natural habitats, and the third restricts urban land expansion.

The key takeaway, Plantinga explained, is that there are tradeoffs for every policy regardless of which baseline scenario is applied. “Projected land-use changes by 2051 will likely enhance the provision of some ecosystem services and decrease the provision of others,” he said. In this application, ecosystem services are defined as the goods and services provided by nature that are of value to people.

In the end, land use is not the most important component, according to Plantinga. “The point is to identify which types of ecosystem services are provided as land use changes,” he concluded. “Food and carbon sequestrations are fine and may even rise under the various scenarios, but you may need strong incentives to limit declines in the provision of other ecosystem services.”

Incentive Structures for Landowners

Plantinga collaborated with many of the same co-authors on another paper which identifies the best auction structure for securing ecosystem services, particularly those provided by private landowners. Building on established auction theory, the paper breaks new ground in structuring an auction that addresses three key challenges to inducing private landowners to provide optimal levels of ecosystem services.

These include the spatial component of ecosystem services. For example, adjoining parcels of land may be more valuable from the perspective of providing habitat than three fragmented parcels adding up to the same size. Additional challenges include asymmetric information, which refers to the fact that landowners know the opportunity cost of their land while the government agency does not, and the requirement to use voluntary incentives or what are often called payments for ecosystem services.

Because forests, clean rivers, climate regulation and other ecosystem services are freely available to everyone, landowners often receive nothing for actions they take on their own land that contribute to the pool of ecosystem services. Those services may be underprovided due to a lack of price incentives for private activities taken for the public good.

The researchers designed an auction that would elicit the optimal enrollment of lands —and the optimal provision of ecosystem services — in situations defined by asymmetric information and spatially dependent benefits.

Contact Info: 

James Badham
james@bren.ucsb.edu
(805) 893-5049

Topics: