• UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Gilbertson Earns Big West Player of the Week Honor https://t.co/P0wmPtDjNT
    1 hour 34 min ago
  • ucsantabarbara twitter avatar
    When secrets are exposed, can life ever be the same? That question is at the heart of @ucsbTD's “Lydia." https://t.co/r1KKTmmB5N
    7 hours 11 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    RT @KCRWinSB: Extreme sports, mountain culture & exotic locations are a few highlights of the @BanffMtnFest. Don't miss it! https://t.co/sR…
    7 hours 13 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    .@DrSidMukherjee on the powerful documentary Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies with @kenburns & @katiecouric https://t.co/p7pRHUrhGr
    7 hours 22 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    Fearless foodies, we're prepping for @AltonBrownLive with a giveaway! Find out how you can win #AltonBrown swag!… https://t.co/7xWh29cuct
    7 hours 38 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    WWP: Gauchos Begin Barbara Kalbus Invitational Against No. 8 Michigan https://t.co/p3U6s9Pswr
    7 hours 51 min ago
  • UCSB_GradPost twitter avatar
    Maria Vazquez on seeing the big picture and grad school life lessons https://t.co/8ghZtxLgvN #UCSB #ucsbgradpost
    8 hours 57 min ago
  • UCSBgauchos twitter avatar
    Gauchos Host Riverside in Final Home Game Thursday https://t.co/FPzQSdg2Ae
    9 hours 18 min ago
  • UCSBengineering twitter avatar
    Cryptographer Stefano Tessaro receives early career recognition from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation https://t.co/iQi8qUA6uS
    9 hours 41 min ago
  • AS_UCSB twitter avatar
    Eager to make your mark on campus? Pop into our winter recruitment fair to learn how to get involved with your A.S.… https://t.co/Cp0VIE7bEq
    10 hours 2 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    RT @CoraKammeyer: So cool to hear @GlobalEcoGuy speak at @brenucsb about the work @calacademy is doing to explore+explain+sustain our awe-i…
    11 hours 31 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    @mrjoshz @benshapiro oops, not an A&L event. Daily Nexus says it was put on by UCSB College Republicans: https://t.co/z8KDFjpXTv
    12 hours 10 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    .@GlobalEcoGuy: Museums are the most trusted institutions in the nation w/ high approval ratings from Dems & Republicans alike #BrenTalks
    13 hours 7 min ago
  • ArtsandLectures twitter avatar
    Looking forward to another collaboration #theemperorofallmaladies #thegene https://t.co/BEzznCTSdN
    13 hours 10 min ago
  • brenucsb twitter avatar
    @GlobalEcoGuy: Museums serve ~ 1 billion visitors a year, more than all the sports stadiums & theme parks in the nation combined #BrenTalks
    13 hours 10 min ago

UCSB Anthropologists Study the Genesis of Reciprocity in Food Sharing

Monday, August 19, 2013 - 17:00
Santa Barbara, CA

3091-1.jpg

Michael Gurven

Michael Gurven

Photo Credit: 

Rod Rolle

When you share your lunch with someone less fortunate or give your friend half of your dessert, does that act of generosity flow from the milk of human kindness, or is it a subconscious strategy to assure reciprocity should you one day find yourself on the other side of the empty plate?

And how do those actions among humans compare to those of our chimpanzee cousins and other nonhuman primates?

Through two separate studies, UC Santa Barbara anthropologists Adrian Jaeggi and Michael Gurven found that reciprocity is similar among monkeys, apes, and humans, even when considering other factors that might otherwise predict helping behavior. However, they also found that only humans showed evidence of reciprocity in food sharing. Their research appears in the current issues of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B and of the journal Evolutionary Anthropology.

"Reciprocity Explains Food Sharing in Humans and Other Primates Independent of Kin Selection and Tolerated Scrounging: A Phylogenetic Meta-Analysis," the Proceedings of the Royal Society B article, compiles quantitative date on cooperative behavior from all existing studies in a number of primate species. "Natural Cooperators: Food Sharing in Humans and Other Primates," the article in Evolutionary Anthropology, goes into greater detail about the origins and maintenance of cooperation among a wide range of primate species, with particular attention to the human case.

"The meta-analysis clearly established that there is reciprocity in sharing both among humans and among other primates that remained significant even after controlling for other factors such as kinship, dominance relationships, and spatial proximity," said Jaeggi, a postdoctoral student in anthropology at UCSB. "Based on our meta-analysis of existing studies, we were able to find no significant differences between humans, monkeys, and apes."

However, Jaeggi noted, humans tend to exchange food for food, while primates tend to barter food for other services, such as grooming or coalition support (e.g. assistance in dominance fights). The relative effects of reciprocity, kinship, and tolerated scrounging were similar, highlighting that all are important factors in explaining the act of sharing.

"Our findings support the idea that actions that benefit another individual tend to, ultimately, also benefit the giver –– either because the recipient is genetically related to the giver or will eventually return the favor," Jaeggi said. "Of course, the giver doesn't have to be consciously aware of the return benefits."

Through natural selection, humans have evolved to form emotional attachments to others and engage in long-term relationships within which reciprocity benefits everyone involved. "This is supported by research showing that reciprocity in many species develops over long periods of time –– much more so than on an immediate tit-for-tat basis," said Jaeggi.

While the research conducted by Jaeggi and Gurven, a professor of anthropology at UCSB, identified reciprocity as an important factor in food sharing, kin selection –– sharing food with genetic relatives –– and tolerated scrounging are also important. In fact, the researchers' meta-analysis shows them to be roughly equal. "But of these three factors, reciprocity has always been the most disputed," Jaeggi said.

"But the meta-analysis now establishes that reciprocity makes a significant contribution. This makes sense given that humans and other primates form long-term relationships for mutual gains, within which benefits given to others tend to be returned," he continued. "Again, this doesn't mean that food is shared with the conscious expectation of receiving shares in return. Reciprocity need not require detailed scorekeeping, but could arise from simpler mechanisms such as preferentially associating with friends, or only allowing friends to take shares of your food."

While humans exchange food on a more in-kind basis, primates tend to share their grub in exchange for services. One reason for this is that human foragers –– people who rely on a hunting-and-gathering lifestyle –– always run the risk of food shortfalls because hunting and foraging returns are unpredictable. When a hunt is successful, however, it provides an abundance that can be shared with others. Gathered fruits can be brought back to a central home base for subsequent sharing. Reciprocal sharing creates a buffer against the risk of shortfalls, ensuring that no one goes hungry.

"Sharing doesn't just enhance the welfare of humans," explained Gurven. "The human subsistence niche would never have been possible without sharing. It's no coincidence that sharing is most pervasive and structured among humans, the one primate whose economy is defined by high levels of interdependence."

Among primates, however, food for sharing tends to be something of a luxury that is often monopolized by the high-ranking, dominant individuals, and they share with those who provide other services to them (e.g. grooming, coalitions). In those species where coalitions are more important for achieving a high dominance rank –– among chimpanzees, for example –– sharing tends to be more common because the dominants rely on others.

While sharing helps primates cement social relationships, the level and diversity of helping behavior is limited compared to what is observed in human societies. "Through sharing, trust, and reputation management, humans found social means of handling different types of risk –– not just day-to-day variation in foraging success –– but also disruptions due to injury, sickness, divorce, and death," Gurven said. "Sharing, therefore, is central to human life history evolution –– from the dependency of children and intergenerational support networks, to the division of labor and cooperative production, to the expansion of human life spans."

Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Evolutionary Anthropology
Tsimane Health and Life History Project

Topics: